Inefficienies

The cable internet at home was a bit flaky over the weekend. This isn’t the first time, but it did it most of the afternoon Saturday and all day Sunday so I figured I should call Comcast and let them know.

The guy on the phone was very apologetic. He ran a trace and sure enough, saw that my modem was trying to connect to their system but wasn’t able to. He ran me through the usual “power it down for 25 seconds and unplug the cable and plug it back in and power it up and maybe it will fix the problem”. No dice.

Now, I don’t claim to know how their system is set up, but years of system administration experience has led me to be somewhat knowledgable about how the internet works and, more specifically, how to use utilities like ping and traceroute to see where network problems are.

Our router, which connects to the cable modem, gets its WAN address via DHCP. There is a web interface in the router that allows me to do this by hand, and see the results. Usually we get assigned some IP address like 69.173.something.something, and it sets the gateway and subnet mask appropriately.

However, during the problems of intermittency, the WAN side of the router would get assigned an address of 192.168.1.100. This 192.168. business, as most networking folks would know, is a reserved block of private addresses you can use for internal networks. Our home network uses 192.168.0.X behind the router, and we don’t use 192.168.1.X anywhere on the network. Yet the router was getting this address assigned to it.

It was not picking up any gateway or subnet mask, however. I was, though, able to ping 192.168.1.1, which I assumed to be the gateway. It responded. No traffic would go out beyond that.

Every few minutes, the DHCP would get the right address. Then it would get the wrong one. Back and forth.

So I explained this to the guy on the phone, but it was way beyond him. He told me we needed to schedule a tech to come out and take a look. Wonderful. This meant I had to be home from 7-9am to meet with him. And I was pretty sure he wasn’t going to find anything wrong on our end.

The internet worked fine again as of late last night, and worked great this morning as well. But since the guy was already scheduled, I figure I’d see what he could do.

He showed up around 8am, and did exactly what I thought he would do: he plugged his equipment into our line and told me the signal looked fine. Of course, our internet was also working fine at this point. He did the same thing again in the attic and also again outside where the cable comes into the house. All times he got a good signal.

I tried to explain my earlier findings and how I thought that the problem wasn’t at the house but wherever the hardware was that we were talking to. This was well beyond him, and his comprehension of Comcast’s internet. He knew how to hook up cable, and run some checks, but he was no internet expert.

So he left after giving me the “everything seems to work”. He also, “graciously”, didn’t charge me for the house call since he didn’t fix anything. Thanks.

I knew this would happen. There was no resolution to this because nobody knew how to accurately diagnose what the problem might be. And why this makes me so mad isn’t because the problem didn’t get fixed - it’s because I’m paying for the inefficient service in the form of the sky-high price of cable and internet. Everytime someone has to schedule this guy to come out and fix something that isn’t even really broken, because they weren’t able to accurately diagnose the problem, it ends up reflecting back into the cable rates that I pay for. And that makes me mad.

I hate knowing that the rate I’m paying for something has to factor in the inefficiencies that they are responsible for. I mean, we routinely buy groceries at Walmart because they have low prices. They’re also notorious for scrutinizing their supply-chain to wrangle out any inefficiencies that may be in it. This keeps the prices low. And I like that.

The icing on the cake was I had to fill out a short questionnaire on how I would rate his service. Of course, it wasn’t a comment card I dropped in the mail. No, he stood there and watched me fill it out, and kept a copy to take back with him. Well, why would I put anything negative down? He knows where I live, and obviously now knows my work schedule.

Someone at the top isn’t thinking very clearly.

11 Responses to “Inefficienies”

  1. m1 Says:

    I would try to get a new cable modem from them; that behavior sounds pretty flakey. I’d think it should consistently assign your router’s IP address regardless of its connectivity.

    Don’t you have SBC/Yahoo DSL down there? Hella cheap in Indy.

  2. TP Says:

    I have boycotted Waltark this year due mainly to inefficiencies in the checkout procedure. You can pretty much plan on waiting at least 30 mins. I went to Kroger one day, and they opened up a register immediately when they saw i was waiting in line. I like that. I have never waited more than 5 min. to check oat since then. BANG! IMHOJ

  3. bigD Says:

    Krog’s hangout in the haute was a birch due to all the people using food stamps and all teh birches using checks.

    Who the hell uses a check?

    We have better technology. Nobody uses the Pony Express any more.

    Welcome to 1980, here’s a credit card.

  4. red2 Says:

    i usually have similar waltark checkout experiences…the earlier you go the better. however, we went to the wal-tark on saturday morning, around 8:30, and there were quite a few cashiers looking for work; it was very pleasant.

  5. m3 Says:

    don’t know aboot the rest of y’all, but my waltarks has a U-scan. m3 rickey the U-scan.

  6. red2 Says:

    no u-scan at the one here…maybe at the new one there building, though.

  7. Caleb Says:

    there?

    wedding’s off.

  8. red2 Says:

    fine. but i’m keeping the bed!

  9. bean Says:

    I just set up our DSL connection at work. Every time I call SBC for help or good ole complainin’, I am astounded at how little the people working tech support actually know. I asked to be transfered to a “level 2″ tech right away, but was still unabvle to communicate with them in an effecient manner. I eventually figured out the problem on my own - it was similar to the problem you had: they tried to have me set things up w/DHCP as if I was a home user - but we have a static account and 8 static IPs. When it was all said and done, she said “Is there anythign else I can help you with?”. Obviously not, since she didnt help me with anythign in the first place.

  10. bean Says:

    Speaking of u-scan. Sometims I really like it… like at waltarks. But I also like to have other options. Often, at the local Home Depot, there are 4 u-scan lines and NO REGULAR CASHIERS and one “commercial checkout” down by the lumber department.

    Eff that noiseJ.

  11. bigD Says:

    u-scan is good when it’s you doing the scanning.

    When you have to wait for someone else to finish, there’s a 100% chance they’ll eff up something simple, like breathing, and waste your tim.