Comments on: C++ Gotcha http://www.tarkblog.org/general/463 The personal writings of Caleb and Annie Tennis Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:12:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: michael http://www.tarkblog.org/general/463#comment-1563 michael Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:51:50 +0000 http://www.tarkblog.org/general/463#comment-1563 is this really a gotcha? it seems like careless programming to me. is this really a gotcha? it seems like careless programming to me.

]]> By: anonymous coward http://www.tarkblog.org/general/463#comment-1497 anonymous coward Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:42:53 +0000 http://www.tarkblog.org/general/463#comment-1497 For one there is no such thing as a const reference. It's a reference-to-const. If you think it makes no difference then try talking about pointers. For one there is no such thing as a const reference. It’s a reference-to-const. If you think it makes no difference then try talking about pointers.

]]> By: Henry Miller http://www.tarkblog.org/general/463#comment-1496 Henry Miller Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:20:55 +0000 http://www.tarkblog.org/general/463#comment-1496 Thanks for the reminder. I knew this, but like you I don't always remember it. I just wish it was subtle things like this that were the cause of my of my errors... Thanks for the reminder. I knew this, but like you I don’t always remember it.

I just wish it was subtle things like this that were the cause of my of my errors…

]]> By: Frank Birbacher http://www.tarkblog.org/general/463#comment-1495 Frank Birbacher Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:30:05 +0000 http://www.tarkblog.org/general/463#comment-1495 The C language does not specify the evaluation order either. BTW, exceptions are to be caught via *const* reference. The C language does not specify the evaluation order either. BTW, exceptions are to be caught via *const* reference.

]]>